ashkir
Full Member
![[Avatar]](http://uploads.virtualforums.co.uk/forums/support/W9M-tej.gif)
Posts: 1,159
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: Cali!
Age: 35
Joined:
pmskypemsnyahoo | | Re: Google Chrome (7th Sep 08 at 11:43am UTC) | | My main issue with Google Chrome that I just stumbled across today is lack of plug-in support. I'm not sure about Flash and others, but I know for a fact that Java does not work in Google Chrome. | |
|
(¯`•Stormraven•._)
Junior Member
![[Avatar]](http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/5867/welshsheepsv0.png)
CodersHangout.co.uk
Posts: 81
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: $_home
Age: 35
Joined:
pmwww | |
Marc
vChat Developer
I <3 Rossy
Posts: 3,388
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 32
Joined:
Additional Groups:
Coding Team
pmwww | | Re: Google Chrome (22nd Sep 08 at 2:58am UTC) | | Google Chrome uses an automatic installer that must be downloaded & installed on the same computer/drive. You can't put it in a flash drive then install it.  | |
rroll.to— Shorten a link, rickroll your friends. |
|
(¯`•Stormraven•._)
Junior Member
CodersHangout.co.uk
Posts: 81
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: $_home
Age: 35
Joined:
pmwww | |
richard
New Member
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
Joined:
pm | | Re: Google Chrome (25th Sep 08 at 10:53am UTC) | | Its nice... I already tried it out. It also supports add-on's in the future, I believe.  | |
|
ashkir
Full Member
Posts: 1,159
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: Cali!
Age: 35
Joined:
pmskypemsnyahoo | | Re: Google Chrome (30th Sep 08 at 5:14pm UTC) | | | Google Chrome has some lockup issues but not as bad as Firefox, Netscape, Safari or IE. Nice. I don't expect Google to become a top in the browser market but their ideas are WORTH it for these other big guys to look at. | |
|
darkdays
Guest | | Re: Google Chrome (23rd Oct 08 at 5:07pm UTC) | | I like that:
It's easy to use/not cluttered
That it takes a snapshot of a web page when you bookmark it.
What I don't like:
It's currently slower than Firefox right now.
It has to create a new process each time you use a new tab. | |
|
Jason
Moderator
![[Avatar]](http://a.random-image.net/frufru/randimage.jpg)
www.random-image.net
Posts: 223
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: University of Waterloo, Canada
Age: 35
Joined:
Additional Groups:
Spell Checker
pmwww | | Re: Google Chrome (24th Oct 08 at 1:30am UTC) | | I like that:
It's easy to use/not cluttered
That it takes a snapshot of a web page when you bookmark it.
What I don't like:
It's currently slower than Firefox right now.
It has to create a new process each time you use a new tab.
Being a multi-process browser is actually considered one of its advantages. When all the different pages run in their own process, and one starts causing problems, you can easily figure out which one. You can also tell if one is hogging up a bunch of resources. And if a page does something stupid and freezes, which would normally crash the browser, or make you have to end task, on Chrome only that tab is affected, and not all your other pages as well. | |
Image Randomizers - official vForums partner
^ Live stats  ^ |
|
Marc
vChat Developer
I <3 Rossy
Posts: 3,388
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 32
Joined:
Additional Groups:
Coding Team
pmwww | | Re: Google Chrome (24th Oct 08 at 10:24pm UTC) | | I like that:
It's easy to use/not cluttered
That it takes a snapshot of a web page when you bookmark it.
What I don't like:
It's currently slower than Firefox right now.
It has to create a new process each time you use a new tab. Being a multi-process browser is actually considered one of its advantages. When all the different pages run in their own process, and one starts causing problems, you can easily figure out which one. You can also tell if one is hogging up a bunch of resources. And if a page does something stupid and freezes, which would normally crash the browser, or make you have to end task, on Chrome only that tab is affected, and not all your other pages as well.
Just to add to that, it's also meant to be the fastest browser currently available; and for me at least, it loads both the program itself and webpages much faster than FF, IE, and Opera. | |
rroll.to— Shorten a link, rickroll your friends. |
|
Nick
Very Senior Member
![[Avatar]](http://uploads.vforums.co.uk/forums/support/f_5e7b1402b305d883af97446b2fedc6c2_1-eog.jpeg)
Posts: 3,012
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: vForums
Age: 34
Joined:
pmwww | | Re: Google Chrome (25th Oct 08 at 4:38am UTC) | | For me Chrome goes really slow. I am not sure if there are new beta's, but Fx3 Runs way much faster then the other's combined.  | |
|
Dreg[Bot]
Moderator
![[Avatar]](http://r2.mrfrufru.com/dregondrahl/avvay.jpg)
Broken
Posts: 415
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Age: 37
Joined:
Additional Groups:
Coding Team
pmYesh im sneaky! | | Re: Google Chrome (31st Oct 08 at 9:20am UTC) | | | Google Chrome is only good for people with 1GB+ RAM | |
Now obsession rules my mind
This commotion makes me blind
Searching out who ever runs
Or has stolen away my life
But i've already said
Don't ever back down
Don't ever turn around
My end has come
So now I come for you.... |
|
Nick
Very Senior Member
Posts: 3,012
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: vForums
Age: 34
Joined:
pmwww | | Re: Google Chrome (4th Nov 08 at 12:08am UTC) | | Google Chrome is only good for people with 1GB+ RAM
I got 2 GB of RAM, and 88 GB of HDD
I downloaded the newest version and this one is way faster, and also my laptops mouse works in Chrome. Meaning when I scroll up it goes up. I downloaded it the day it came out, and just did not get around to it.
I actually like it ALLOT. Just not as much as Fire Fox. | |
|
