vForums: Message Board Support - CodeBlocks vs. Dev C++

Topic Rating:	Printable View

Marc
vChat Developer

I <3 Rossy

Posts: 3,388
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 32
Joined:

Additional Groups:
Coding Team

Reputation: 40%

CodeBlocks vs. Dev C++ (13th Sep 08 at 8:45pm UTC)
Which do you prefer, and why? Personally, I prefer CodeBlocks as it's much more customizable and has a few extra features that Dev C++ doesn't. The only thing I don't like about CodeBlocks is that the compiler will not run properly on Vista. Even with MinGW installed, upon running the compiler it returns a bunch of errors about library files not existing.
Back to Top - Link to Post
rroll.to— Shorten a link, rickroll your friends.

darkdays
Guest

Re: CodeBlocks vs. Dev C++ (29th Nov 08 at 9:40pm UTC)
I've never used CodeBlocks so I prefer Dev-C++, though if there's one C++ development program that I really prefer, it's Visual Studio.
Back to Top - Link to Post

dog199200
Guest

Re: CodeBlocks vs. Dev C++ (6th Feb 09 at 10:33pm UTC)
Posted By Marc on 13th Sep 08 at 8:45pm Which do you prefer, and why? Personally, I prefer CodeBlocks as it's much more customizable and has a few extra features that Dev C++ doesn't. The only thing I don't like about CodeBlocks is that the compiler will not run properly on Vista. Even with MinGW installed, upon running the compiler it returns a bunch of errors about library files not existing. Marc i'm not sure what your talking about, I am running Vista and I use CodeBlocks just fine with no problems at all. The only problem I have is I can't make any DirectX file formats because i get the "library files not existing" type error as well.
Back to Top - Link to Post - Last edit: by dog199200

Marc
vChat Developer

I <3 Rossy

Posts: 3,388
Status: Offline
Gender: Male
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 32
Joined:

Additional Groups:
Coding Team

Reputation: 40%

Re: CodeBlocks vs. Dev C++ (7th Feb 09 at 4:21am UTC)
Posted By dog199200 on 6th Feb 09 at 10:33pm Posted By Marc on 13th Sep 08 at 8:45pm Which do you prefer, and why? Personally, I prefer CodeBlocks as it's much more customizable and has a few extra features that Dev C++ doesn't. The only thing I don't like about CodeBlocks is that the compiler will not run properly on Vista. Even with MinGW installed, upon running the compiler it returns a bunch of errors about library files not existing. Marc i'm not sure what your talking about, I am running Vista and I use CodeBlocks just fine with no problems at all. The only problem I have is I can't make any DirectX file formats because i get the "library files not existing" type error as well. This topic is way back from September; I fixed the issue a long time ago.
Back to Top - Link to Post
rroll.to— Shorten a link, rickroll your friends.

dog199200
Guest

Re: CodeBlocks vs. Dev C++ (7th Feb 09 at 7:56am UTC)
i'm sorry, i didn't pay attention to the date posted
Back to Top - Link to Post

	Printable View